Few topics divide pediatric feeding circles like ankyloglossia. Frenotomy rates have risen sharply, marketing has gotten aggressive, and families now arrive either convinced their baby needs a release or already booked for one. As the feeding therapist in the room, you are often the last calm, conservative voice before a procedure, or the first one after it did not deliver what was promised.
This is a chance to lead with skill rather than take a side in a culture war.
What is actually contested
Real ties exist and releases help the right babies. What is contested is the threshold. Assessment is not well standardized, the "posterior tie" label is applied inconsistently, the evidence base for many releases is thinner than the confidence around them, and in some settings there is a clear financial incentive to cut. None of that means releases are bad. It means the decision deserves a comprehensive functional assessment, which is exactly what we are trained to provide.
The SLP, OT, and IBCLC overlap
A lot of the friction in this space is really a scope question. An IBCLC owns the breastfeeding dyad: maternal supply, positioning, pain, and the nursing relationship. An SLP or OT with infant feeding competency owns the functional swallowing and oral-motor picture, and can also address bottle feeding, flow and pacing, transition to solids, and signs of dysphagia that sit outside a lactation-only lens. The work overlaps heavily on the infant side, which is where the turf tension comes from, and some clinicians hold both credentials.
The productive framing is not who gets to assess the baby, but who covers which lens. The strongest care pathway pairs an IBCLC on the breastfeeding side with an SLP or OT on the functional feeding side, coordinating rather than competing. Worth saying plainly to families: a parent does not need to start with a lactation consultant and wait for a referral to reach feeding therapy. A feeding therapist can run the functional evaluation directly.
Why the two easy positions fail families
The reflexive "ties are overdiagnosed, do not cut" risks dismissing babies who genuinely need a release and are suffering at the breast. The reflexive "release first, ask later" skips the functional feeding evaluation that determines whether tissue is even the limiting factor. Families are stuck between a lactation consultant, a pediatrician, and a dentist who disagree. The feeding therapist who can run a true functional assessment is the one who can settle it.
Positioning the feeding therapist's role
- Lead with function. Watch a full feed, and assess oral-motor skill, latch, suck-swallow-breathe coordination, and milk transfer before anyone talks about tissue.
- Try conservative measures first. Positioning, latch, and pacing changes resolve a meaningful share of presumed ties.
- Collaborate, do not compete. Coordinate with the IBCLC, pediatrician, and ENT or release provider, and document clearly.
- Own the before and after. When a release is appropriate, pre- and post-frenotomy therapy and oral-motor work give it the best chance to actually improve feeding.
- Know when to refer out, and when to recommend waiting.
What to say to families who arrive convinced
- Validate and slow down: "You are right that feeding has been hard, and I want to find out exactly why before anyone does a procedure that cannot be undone."
- Reframe the release: "A release can help, but it works best when we know tissue is the real limiter and we support the muscles around it. Let me assess a full feed first."
- Protect the relationship with referrers without rubber-stamping. Keep the assessment functional and the documentation clear.
Naming the skilled service
A laser does not assess feeding. A reel does not watch a full feed. The skilled work is the functional evaluation, the conservative trial, the oral-motor plan, the pre- and post-release support, and the clinical judgment about who needs a procedure and who does not. That judgment is the whole value, and it is rising in demand precisely because the field is so noisy.
The opportunity, and Coral Care
Families are overwhelmed and looking for a trustworthy guide. Feeding therapists who can offer a calm, functional, in-person assessment are positioned to be exactly that.
Coral Care is a pediatric in-home OT, SLP, and PT network across nine states. Our feeding clinicians evaluate babies feeding in their own homes and coordinate with each family's lactation consultant and medical team, with the time to do a functional assessment properly. We handle credentialing, billing, and scheduling so your time goes to clinical care, not logistics. Learn about joining Coral Care.
Related reading
Frequently Asked Questions
Does tongue-tie cause speech problems?
The speech impact is often overstated. Assess directly rather than assuming, and counsel families accordingly.
How do I collaborate with IBCLCs and ENTs without friction?
Stay in your lane of functional assessment and oral-motor treatment, document clearly, and frame yourself as coordinating care rather than overruling anyone.
What about posterior tongue-tie?
It is the least standardized and most debated diagnosis. Approach it with extra scrutiny and clear functional documentation.
How do I handle a family already booked for a release?
Validate their experience, offer a functional feeding assessment first, and frame therapy as what makes a release actually work, without attacking the referring provider.
Should feeding therapy come before a frenotomy?
Generally yes. A functional evaluation and a conservative trial should precede a procedure, and therapy before and after a release improves outcomes.
Can an SLP or OT assess infant feeding, or is that the IBCLC's role?
Both have a role. An SLP or OT with infant feeding competency performs the functional swallowing and oral-motor assessment and can address bottle feeding and dysphagia. An IBCLC covers the breastfeeding dyad and maternal factors. They overlap on the infant side and work best coordinating.
Are tongue-ties overdiagnosed?
Many providers believe the threshold for diagnosis has loosened and that some releases happen without a functional feeding assessment. Real ties still exist and can benefit from release, so the goal is judgment, not a blanket position.
